![]() App-V requires far more bandwidth to deliver applications than Remote Desktop Services or Citrix XenApp because the complete application (and often a bit more) is delivered to the client.App-V doesn’t change where applications are executed – applications delivered by App-V still use local resources just like installed applications.There’s a couple of points to consider when understanding where App-V fits within the application deployment puzzle: If you’ve come here seeking an answer to this question, then you should first read about what App-V is. ![]() See the comments on this post as an example. People make assumptions about the ability to stream applications to end-points with App-V and confuse this with remote presentation of applications. “Does App-V replace Citrix XenApp?” or “Is App-V a Citrix killer?” I’m surprised that this one keeps coming up although I’ve been hearing it for years.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |